The Burgeoning Significance of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in the Pathogenesis and Therapeutics of Cancers.

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a physiological phenomenon that parallels the mixing of oil and water, giving rise to compartments with diverse physical properties. Biomolecular condensates, arising from LLPS, serve as critical regulators of gene expression and control, with a particular significance in the context of malignant tumors. Recent investigations have unveiled the intimate connection between LLPS and cancer, a nexus that profoundly impacts various facets of cancer progression, including DNA repair, transcriptional regulation, oncogene expression, and the formation of critical membraneless organelles within the cancer microenvironment. This review provides a comprehensive account of the evolution of LLPS from the molecular to the pathological level. We explore the mechanisms by through which biomolecular condensates govern diverse cellular physiological processes, encompassing gene expression, transcriptional control, signal transduction, and responses to environmental stressors. Furthermore, we concentrate on potential therapeutic targets and the development of small-molecule inhibitors associated with LLPS in prevalent clinical malignancies. Understanding the role of LLPS and its interplay within the tumor milieu holds promise for enhancing cancer treatment strategies, particularly in overcoming drug resistance challenges. These insights offer innovative perspectives and support for advancing cancer therapy.

Personalized application of antimicrobial drugs in pediatric patients with augmented renal clearance: a review of literature.

The effect of renal functional status on drug metabolism is a crucial consideration for clinicians when determining the appropriate dosage of medications to administer. In critically ill patients, there is often a significant increase in renal function, which leads to enhanced drug metabolism and potentially inadequate drug exposure. This phenomenon, known as augmented renal clearance (ARC), is commonly observed in pediatric critical care settings. The findings of the current study underscore the significant impact of ARC on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs in critically ill pediatric patients. Moreover, the study reveals a negative correlation between increased creatinine clearance and blood concentrations of antimicrobial drugs. The article provides a comprehensive review of ARC screening in pediatric patients, including its definition, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it summarizes the dosages and dosing regimens of commonly used antibacterial and antiviral drugs for pediatric patients with ARC, and recommendations are made for dose and infusion considerations and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring. CONCLUSION:  ARC impacts antimicrobial drugs in pediatric patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • ARC is inextricably linked to the failure of antimicrobial therapy, recurrence of infection, and subtherapeutic concentrations of drugs. WHAT IS NEW: • This study provides an updated overview of the influence of ARC on medication use and clinical outcomes in pediatric patients. • In this context, there are several recommendations for using antibiotics in pediatric patients with ARC: 1) increase the dose administered; 2) prolonged or continuous infusion administration; 3) use of TDM; and 4) use alternative drugs that do not undergo renal elimination.

Corrigendum: Bibliometric analysis of evolutionary trends and hotspots of super-enhancers in cancer.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192855.].

Individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with augmented renal clearance.

Objectives: Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a state of enhanced renal function commonly observed in 30%-65% of critically ill patients despite normal serum creatinine levels. Using unadjusted standard dosing regimens of renally eliminated drugs in ARC patients often leads to subtherapeutic concentrations, poor clinical outcomes, and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. We summarized pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic research on the definition, underlying mechanisms, and risk factors of ARC to guide individualized dosing of antibiotics and various strategies for optimizing outcomes. Methods: We searched for articles between 2010 and 2022 in the MEDLINE database about ARC patients and antibiotics and further provided individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC. Results: 25 antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with ARC and various strategies for optimization of outcomes, such as extended infusion time, continuous infusion, increased dosage, and combination regimens, were summarized according to previous research. Conclusion: ARC patients, especially critically ill patients, need to make individualized adjustments to antibiotics, including dose, frequency, and method of administration. Further comprehensive research is required to determine ARC staging, expand the range of recommended antibiotics, and establish individualized dosing guidelines for ARC patients.

Bibliometric analysis of evolutionary trends and hotspots of super-enhancers in cancer.

Introduction: In the past decade, super-enhancer (SE) has become a research hotspot with increasing attention on cancer occurrence, development, and prognosis. To illustrate the hotspots of SE in cancer research and its evolutionary tendency, bibliometric analysis was carried out for this topic. Methods: Literature published before Dec 31, 2022, in WOSCC, was systematically classified, and Citespace, bibliometric.com/app, and GraphPad Prism analyzed the data. Results: After screening out inappropriate documents and duplicate data, 911 publications were selected for further bibliometric analysis. The top five research areas were Oncology (257, 28.211%), Cell Biology (210, 23.052%), Biochemistry Molecular Biology (209, 22.942%), Science Technology Other Topics (138, 15.148%), and Genetics Heredity (132, 14.490%). The United States of America (United States) has the highest number of documents (462, 50.71%), followed by China (303, 33.26%). Among the most productive institutions, four of which are from the United States and one from Singapore, the National University of Singapore. Harvard Medical School (7.68%) has the highest percentage of articles. Young, Richard A, with 32 publications, ranks first in the number of articles. The top three authors came from Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research as a research team. More than two-thirds of the research are supported by the National Institutes of Health of the United States (337, 37.654%) and the United States Department of Health Human Services (337, 37.654%). And "super enhancer" (525), "cell identity" (258), "expression" (223), "cancer" (205), and "transcription factor" (193) account for the top 5 occurrence keywords. Discussion: Since 2013, SE and cancer related publications have shown a rapid growth trend. The United States continues to play a leading role in this field, as the top literature numbers, affiliations, funding agencies, and authors were all from the United States, followed by China and European countries. A high degree of active cooperation is evident among a multitude of countries. The role of SEs in cell identity, gene transcription, expression, and inhibition, as well as the relationship between SEs and TFs, and the selective inhibition of SEs, have received much attention, suggesting that they are hot issues for research.

Efficacy and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections: A retrospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Limited data on clinical and microbiological efficacy, patient mortality, and other associated factors are available for ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI)-based regimens for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). This study aimed to assess these issues retrospectively using multicenter data. METHODS: This multicenter study included CR-GNB infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based regimens for more than three days. Patient characteristics, bacterial culture reports, drug-sensitivity test results, and antibiotic use, including CAZ/AVI use, were extracted from the patient's clinical records. The clinical and microbiological efficacy of the combined drug regimen and patient mortality were evaluated according to corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the efficacy and mortality-related factors. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with CR-GNB infection were considered for the analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the treatment of CAZ/AVI-based regimens, the clinical efficacy was 75.4 %. The 7-day microbial efficacy and clearance rate after treatment were 43.7 % and 66.0 %, respectively. Moreover, 30-day all-cause and in-hospital mortality were 11.5 % and 14.2 %, respectively. Harboring renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate (CCR) of<20 mL/min), cardiovascular diseases, and digestive system diseases were independent risk factors for poor clinical efficacy of CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Bloodstream infection (BSI), patients with the adjusted doses of CAZ/AVI, and CAZ/AVI co-administration with carbapenem were independently associated factors of bacterial clearance by CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Age, total hospital stays, use of mechanical ventilation, and cumulative CAZ/AVI dose were independent factors associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: CAZ/AVI was an effective drug in treating CR-GNB infection. CAZ/AVI that is mostly excreted by the kidney and is accumulated in renal impairment should be renally adjusted. Renal dysfunction and the adjusted dose of CAZ/AVI were associated with efficacy. Clinicians should individualize CAZ/AVI regimen and dose by the level of renal function to achieve optimal efficacy and survival. The efficacy of CAZ/AVI in the treatment of CR-GNB infection, as well as the implementation of individualized precision drug administration of CAZ/AVI according to patients' different infection sites, renal function, bacterial types, bacterial resistance mechanisms, blood concentration monitoring and other conditions need to be further studied in multicenter.

The Emerging Role of Super-enhancers as Therapeutic Targets in The Digestive System Tumors.

Digestive system tumors include malignancies of the stomach, pancreas, colon, rectum, and the esophagus, and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Aberrant epigenetic modifications play a vital role in the progression of digestive system tumors. The aberrant transcription of key oncogenes is driven by super-enhancers (SEs), which are characterized by large clusters of enhancers with significantly high density of transcription factors, cofactors, and epigenetic modulatory proteins. The SEs consist of critical epigenetic regulatory elements, which modulate the biological characteristics of digestive system tumors including tumor cell identity and differentiation, tumorigenesis, environmental response, immune response, and chemotherapeutic resistance. The core transcription regulatory loop of the digestive system tumors is complex and a high density of transcription regulatory complexes in the SEs and the crosstalk between SEs and the noncoding RNAs. In this review, we summarized the known characteristics and functions of the SEs in the digestive system tumors. Furthermore, we discuss the oncogenic roles and regulatory mechanisms of SEs in the digestive system tumors. We highlight the role of SE-driven genes, enhancer RNAs (eRNAs), lncRNAs, and miRNAs in the digestive system tumor growth and progression. Finally, we discuss clinical significance of the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system and inhibitors of SE-related proteins such as BET and CDK7 as potential cancer therapeutics.

Superenhancers as master gene regulators and novel therapeutic targets in brain tumors.

Transcriptional deregulation, a cancer cell hallmark, is driven by epigenetic abnormalities in the majority of brain tumors, including adult glioblastoma and pediatric brain tumors. Epigenetic abnormalities can activate epigenetic regulatory elements to regulate the expression of oncogenes. Superenhancers (SEs), identified as novel epigenetic regulatory elements, are clusters of enhancers with cell-type specificity that can drive the aberrant transcription of oncogenes and promote tumor initiation and progression. As gene regulators, SEs are involved in tumorigenesis in a variety of tumors, including brain tumors. SEs are susceptible to inhibition by their key components, such as bromodomain protein 4 and cyclin-dependent kinase 7, providing new opportunities for antitumor therapy. In this review, we summarized the characteristics and identification, unique organizational structures, and activation mechanisms of SEs in tumors, as well as the clinical applications related to SEs in tumor therapy and prognostication. Based on a review of the literature, we discussed the relationship between SEs and different brain tumors and potential therapeutic targets, focusing on glioblastoma.

Small Interfering RNA for Gliomas Treatment: Overcoming Hurdles in Delivery.

Gliomas are central nervous system tumors originating from glial cells, whose incidence and mortality rise in coming years. The current treatment of gliomas is surgery combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, developing therapeutic resistance is one of the significant challenges. Recent research suggested that small interfering RNA (siRNA) has excellent potential as a therapeutic to silence genes that are significantly involved in the manipulation of gliomas' malignant phenotypes, including proliferation, invasion, metastasis, therapy resistance, and immune escape. However, it is challenging to deliver the naked siRNA to the action site in the cells of target tissues. Therefore, it is urgent to develop delivery strategies to transport siRNA to achieve the optimal silencing effect of the target gene. However, there is no systematic discussion about siRNAs' clinical potential and delivery strategies in gliomas. This review mainly discusses siRNAs' delivery strategies, especially nanotechnology-based delivery systems, as a potential glioma therapy. Moreover, we envisage the future orientation and challenges in translating these findings into clinical applications.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Concentrations in Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae-Infected Patients With Different Kidney Statuses.

Aims: Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) is the most common carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae with high mortality. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has exhibited excellent in vitro activity in vivo against CRKP. However, the efficacy of CAZ-AVI in KPC-producing CRKP-infected patients with different kidney statuses varies, such as renal insufficiency, normal renal function, and augmented renal clearance (ARC). We explored the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to evaluate the concentration and efficacy of CAZ-AVI in CRKP-infected patients with different kidney statuses. Methods: Serum concentrations for CAZ and AVI were determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography method. Bacterial identification, routine susceptibility testing, renal function index, and others were performed in standard protocols in the hospital's clinical laboratories. Results: In the two patients with ARC, in case 1, CAZ-AVI 2.5g q6h was used with good efficacy, and the concentrations were up to the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics targets. In Case 2, 2.5 g q8h was used with invalid effectiveness, and AVI Cmin was only 0.797 mg/l, which is lower than the PK/PD target. Case 3 was renal insufficiency using CAZ-AVI 1.25 q8h, and case 4 was normal renal function using 2.5 g q8h. Their concentrations were both up to the PK/PD targets. Conclusion: TDM results demonstrated that CAZ-AVI steady-state plasma concentration varies among patients with different kidney statuses, providing evidence for the utility of TDM of CAZ-AVI in individualized drug dose adjustment. ARC patients may need more CAZ-AVI daily doses than the standard dose.

Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy Assessment of Polymyxin B Use in Renal Transplant Patients.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the nephrotoxicity and efficacy assessment of polymyxin B (PMB) use in renal transplant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included adult (>18 years of age) renal transplant patients who received PMB intravenous drip for more than 72 hours. Efficacy assessment of PMB included clinical treatment efficacy, microbiological efficacy at the end of PMB treatment, and in-hospital all-cause mortality. Nephrotoxicity of PMB was evaluated for further group comparison. RESULTS: We enrolled 235 renal transplant patients in our study. After PMB treatment, 45 patients occurred PMB-nephrotoxicity, and the nephrotoxicity rate was 19.15%. Among them, 44 patients were RIFLE R stage, and one patient was RIFLE I stage. The dose of PMB used in patients was 40.0 (40.0-50.0) mg q12h with a loading dose of 41.8±9.8 mg. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ICU admission, vasoactive agents, aminoglycosides, creatinine clearance rate before PMB use, and mean total hospital stay were independent risk factors of PMB-nephrotoxicity in kidney transplant patients. The clinical effective rate was 97.9%, and the microbiological clean rate was 66.7%. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that PMB low dose regimens might achieve good efficacy and less nephrotoxicity in renal transplant patients. We should evaluate the severity of the infection and renal function of patients, avoid the combined use of other nephrotoxic drugs, and minimize the course of use to reduce the occurrence of PMB-nephrotoxicity.